| 翻訳と辞書 |
| James v. Illinois ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
James v. Illinois
''James v. Illinois'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court declined to extend the allowance of statements obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona to impeach inconsistent statements made by a defendant at trial to inconsistent statements made by a third party.
==Background==
On August 30, 1982 a group of eight boys was confronted by another group of boys who demanded money. The group of eight refused and was fired upon, resulting in the death of one boy and injury to another. After police arrived on the scene the group of eight acted as witnesses by recounting their experience to the police. Darryl James was eventually brought into custody as a suspect. He was arrested in his mother's beauty salon. The police questioned him about his hair color to which he responded that although his hair was currently black and curly it had previously been reddish-brown and slicked back. After arriving at the police station James was again questioned and he then told police he changed his hair color to alter his appearance.
James was eventually indicted for murder and attempted murder. James attempted to suppress the statements he had previously made about his hair as being fruit of the poisonous tree in violation of the Fourth Amendment as lacking probable cause for his arrest. The trial court sustained the motion for suppression of the evidence.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「James v. Illinois」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|